Hamlet - Intelligent , NOT Insane Essay -- William Shakespeare Hamlet

throughout the Shakespearian turn of events, crossroads, the main character is given the overwhelming responsibility of avenging his sires foul and nigh unnatural murder (I.iv.36). Such a burden can slowly drive a man saturnine the deep end psychologically. Because of this, hamlets disposition is extremely dissonant and erratic throughout the play. At times he shows signs of un applylable insanity. Whenever he interacts with the characters he is wild, crazy, and plays a fool. At other times, he exemplifies intelligence and method in his gruesomeness. In instances when he is al oneness or with Horatio, he is educate and sane. juncture goes through different stages of insanity throughout the story, but his mental case and skeptical personality amplifies his persona of seeming insane to the other characters. Hamlet comes up with the idea to assumed madness in the beginning of the play in order to confuse his enemies. However, for Hamlet to fulfill his duty of acquire rev enge, he must be totally sane. Hamlets sharp brilliance make it seem too impossible for him to actually be mad, for to be insane means that one is irrational and without any sense. When one is irrational, one is not governed by or according to reason. So, Hamlet is solely acting mad in order to formulate his revenge on Claudius. In order for Hamlet to slobber out his goal of revenge, he had to be totally sane. In Act I, he is warned by the tone not to go mad and not to harm his mother. If Hamlet were very mad, he would have done many unorthodox acts, which would only wreck his send off of getting revenge. There can be no such thing as restrained insanity. Hamlets sanity is displayed when he does not harm his mother. Gertrude has hurt Hamlet. She betrayed his begin by having an affair with Claudius and in the end marrying him. Since Hamlet does not kill her, it shows he is in full control of his mental state and that he is not controlled by his feelings like most mad pe ople. Another reason why Hamlet is not mad is in the way he escaped his awaited execution in England. Hamlet knew that he was to be sent to England to be killed on the orders of Claudius. besides once he saw a chance of escape on the pirate ship, he took this opportunity to board the ship, which made him escape death, thereof prolonging his life a little longer. If Hamlet were actually mad, it would be indistinct that he would know of Claudius plans,... ...nd not making any sense whatsoever. In comparison, Hamlet speaks in regular sentences, and is able to converse normally with those or so him. With much thought, and careful planning, Hamlet searches for evidence to determine the truth about(predicate) his fathers murder. And with this in hand, he departs on a path to avenge his father that is both reasonable and rational. While Hamlet might not carry the best of luck with him throughout the play, he certainly holds onto his mental rightfulness and ability to reason thro ugh challenges.Hamlet feigns madness so that he will be able to successfully get revenge on Claudius. In order for his plan not to be discovered, he has to fake madness in order to throw off his enemies. For his revenge plan to be a success, Hamlet will have to be absolutely sane so that he wont sabotage his plan in anyway, and to keep himself alive long enough to carry it out. Hamlets plan on proving Claudius guilt and whether or not the locomote is his dead father shows that Hamlet is too intelligent to be mad. If Hamlet were indeed mad, he would be too dim-witted to come up with such a clever plan. BibliographyShakespear, William. Hamlet. Don Mills HBJ, 1987