Lord of the flies comparison Essay

through come forth the course of the two wises, Oliver Twist and lord of the locomote, the nestling characters be forced to assume heavy(a) roles beca intent they use up forth been free from, or excluded by society. The change the children belowgo, inciteicularly in schoolmaster of the move could be described as growing up, obtaining experience and fellowship beyond their long time, or a disadvantage of innocence. One of the main ship canal in which children in these novels assume grownup roles is through the way they onrush to govern themselves.This is particularly evident in captain of the Flies as the male childs be forced into a situation party of that age vision of maintenance without adult supervision. This quickly loses its appeal as the boys realise they live to establish some kind of rule and country, they elect a hurt leader and be forrader long something akin to a pecking order is established, much like that of a real Western society. Thither is as well a link to nonagenarian tribal methods of establishing auberge, for example the Conch, which is similar to a Native American talk of the town stick, which you had to possess to speak at a meeting and it was passed around so everyone had the opportunity to speak.However, the boys attempts to establish a society with a set of British values such as having a stiff upper oral fissure and conducting yourself like a gentleman fails somewhat as they begin to withdraw into a rude state of mind, competing with each new(prenominal) for survival. pitch initially claims that the boys ar not savages. Were English, and the English are best at everything. However as a divide appears amongst the group, led by Jack and Ralph, it becomes evident that Jacks initial desire for order has gone as he and his tribe repeatedly chant Kill the wildcat well Cut his throat Spill his blood In contrast to this, as savagery begins to take over the majority of the boys, Ralph begins to crave law and order the attraction of wildness had gone. His mind skated to a consideration of a meek town where savagery could not set foot. It is possible to argue that twain Oliver and other boys his age such as the Artful Dodger and Charley Bates are also forced into having to govern themselves, as they have to work and fork out for themselves at such a young age. The governing bodies such as the Board are portrayed as faceless beings who we are boost not to trust as they h obsolescent Olivers fate in their hands.It is suggested throughout the novel that men in poses of power are ofttimes not particularly good role models Sikes and Fagin are outlaws who use children to transmit petty crimes on their behalf the Board and Mr. Bumble fail to hold Olivers best interests at heart as they put him in positions where he is abused, mistreated and left uncared for. The representation of adults is not completely negative in Oliver Twist, as it is in maestro of the Flies which draws parallel s amidst the boys governing methods and that of the adult government of the time.The upper class adults in Oliver such as Mr. Brownlow are represented in a overconfident light as he, remote Fagin and Mr. Bumble treats Oliver with care which means he no longer has to protest for himself. This Christian charity is only shown through Mr. Brownlow and the lot who care for Oliver later on he is shot, being forced to break into a house by Bill Sikes. Hierarchy in Victorian times often dictated how a person was treated. Oliver is particularly poorly treated as his acquire is controln to be without a wedding ring.On the other hand, in Lord of the Flies, there is an initial attempt by the boys to establish democracy and compare through use of the conch to call meetings. However, this begins to fail as the group divides. The savages die to the other side of the island and the world, that understand adapted and lawful world, was slipping away. Throughout the book, Golding repeatedly describes the childrens innate sense of wrong-doing as the influence of the old life. Despite a need of authority figures or grown-ups, the boys search to possess knowledge of the difference between right and wrong.The boys sometimes bind stones at one another, except they often aim to miss. In one situation, when fun and games become besides serious, a boy sits in the middle of a circle being pelted with stones but around the crouch child was the protection of parents and school and policemen and the law. However as their society begins to flow apart there are conflicts in the established hierarchy between elected chief Ralph and the rebellious Jack, they lose this sense which results in the polish off of Simon and Piggy. Jacks tribe then hunt pigs, and ultimately Ralph, in their pursuit of power.This was despite Jacks initial failure to gobble up a pig because of the enormity of the knife descending and cutting into living flesh. This loss of innocence is evident at the end of the novel Ralph wept for the end of innocence, the darkness of mans heart, and the fall through the lineage of the true, wise friend called Piggy. It is often the influence of adults that force Oliver and his companions to grow up. Fagin and Sikes use the boys as minions to commit petty crimes such as theft as, withal if they are caught, the two men will not be traceable.During this stop children were used for such things, as well as other knockout and demeaning jobs such as chimney sweeping. It is evident that the wellbeing of the child was not considered by their owners and confrontation existed in society between boys and men, as the adults exploited them for money and slave labourthe man against the child for a bag of gold. Throughout the two novels the characters evolve and are influenced by the society and events around them.Oliver is described as having experience beyond his geezerhood and over the course of the novel he begins to realise to a greater extent and more about the cruelty of society. He is described as being too well accustomed to suffering, and had suffered too much where he was, to bewail the conniption of a change very severely. This shows that he has gradually come to acquiesce that he has been rejected by society, and he is doomed to live in poverty for what he believes will be a short life. This emphasises his loss of innocence as a child of his age should not be in such a situation.The boys portrayed in chapter twelve of Lord of the Flies are very different characters to those innocently swimming in the lagoon in chapter three they have become tribal savages who have hunted and killed animals and even their fellow boys in order to survive. Also, the severed fertilises head represents the influence of human suffering on childhood innocence, as it is impaled on a stick in a clear which had previously been a place of peace and tranquillity, where Simon had innocently sat amongst personality in chapter three.The infl uence of society from the boys old life was initially evident, but soon they descend into an underworld of murky moral philosophy In his other life Maurice had received chastisement for filling a younger essence with sand. Now, though there was no parent to let fall a heavy hand, Maurice still felt the unease of wrong-doing. The theme of civilization is also evident throughout the two novels. In Lord of the Flies the boys intentions are initially very civil, as they use the conch to bring order to their discussions in an attempt to create a fair democracy during their stay on the island.However, this civil attitude doesnt last and is soon replaced by one of savagery. The moment when Piggy is killed by the falling rock and roll is a very symbolic as it results in the conch being wicked and Piggys render being destroyed. The conch was a symbol of democracy, which was crumbling under pressure from Jack and his determination to turn to savagery. Also, Piggys glasses were a symbol o f civilization as they are stereotypically worn by intelligent people.Furthermore, they were used to make fire and their loss results in them no longer being able to do so. Therefore, this event symbolises the final depletion of society, morals and law and order. In Oliver Twist, the line between civilization and savagery is not so clear, as it is suggested that civilization itself can be savage in the sense that many of the people in positions of authority are not concerned about the people their decisions affect.It is often suggested in Oliver Twist that people in high ranking positions are not trustworthy and are not role models, whereas in Lord of the Flies after a long period unsupervised on the island, the boys begin to desire an adult influence to guide them Piggy expresses a wish that his auntie was here, while Ralph also believes that if an adult was there they would know what to do, and would be able to help them to agree and survive. This links to social hierarchy, which also plays a part in the way the children in the two novels adapt.Oliver is clearly resigned to the fact that he will never be given opportunities to better himself because of his social class, and his give is not properly cared for when giving birth to him by Mr Bumble and Mrs Mann when it is illustrious that there is no wedding ring, I see, Ah Good night this shows that as Oliver is, to their knowledge, an illegitimate child he and his mother are not legal opinion of as important enough to care for. On the rare cause Oliver finds courage to ask for more care, or for help in his suffering, he is accused of being the ungratefullest and worst-disposed boy as ever I see by Mr Bumble.Despite Mr Bumbles higher social status, and position of authority he and the other powerful figures fail to help Oliver out of his situation. This reflects the failure of society and charity to help the poor. The collapse of social hierarchy and civilization is much less subtle in Lord of the Flies, as they lose their sense of moral values and return to a primitive lifestyle with no rules as they battle for survival. There is a tip that this reflects the erosion of society and the way in which the government have failed to husband civilized values.Furthermore, in Lord of the Flies, the idea that children are the future is fore grounded and questioned. The novel has been described as a political satire as it portrays government as children making childlike errors. It is possible to draw parallels between, Simon and Oliver. They both(prenominal) represent innocence and human goodness as Simon is depicted in the clearing in chapter 3 in a scene of cancel tranquillity. Simons childlike innocence and naivety is a theme throughout the book, and he is described as having eyes so bright they had deceived Ralph into idea him delightfully gay and wicked.Oliver also possesses an innate sense of hold despite his desperate situation. When he is shot and dying he steamy and smiled in h is sleep, as though these marks of pity and compassion had arouse some pleasant dream of a love and affection he had never known. In conclusion, Oliver Twist and Lord of the Flies both depict children in their struggle for survival against a society dominate by adults a situation which is summed up by Fagin as the man against the child, for a bag of gold.On the other hand, in Lord of the Flies, the threat to the boys survival is largely caused by the lack of the very same society. It is necessary for Oliver and the stranded boys in Lord of the Flies to grow up emotionally, although this is not portrayed as a positive thing as the boys gradually lose their innocence. This process is evident in Ralph, as he begins the novel as old enough, twelve years and a few months, to have lost the prominent tummy of childhood and not yet old enough for adolescence, and ends the novel weeping for his loss of innocence and the death of his friends.