The History of the Cosmological Argument for the Existence of God Essay

Early elements of the Cosmological business were developed by the world renowned philosophers Plato and Aristotle between the years 400 and 200 BC (Boeree). Medieval philosopher Saint Thomas Aquinas expanded upon their ideas in the tardy 13th Century when he wrote, The Five Ways. Since then the Cosmological Argument has become one of the near widely accepted and criticized arguments for the universe of discourse of God. My butt in this paper is to explain wherefore the Cosmological Argument is a reasonable argument for the existence of God, the importance of sympathy that it is an inductive a posteriori argument, and defend my position against common opposing arguments.To begin, as living humane beings on the planet earth we bear safely conclude that most every issue in existence has a suit of clothes. We observe that in that location is a bring behind the flat tire we receive while driving to school. at that place is a cause behind why we earned a weaknes s grade in Philosophy. There is a cause behind why our bodies feel pain. And there is even a cause for why moss grows heaviest on the North side of trees. Saint Thomas Aquinas argues that everything in existence has a cause and therefore whole things are contingent and finite. That is to say, Everything in nature can both exist and not exist, given that we run into things in nature to come into and pass out of existence (Ruckaber, 2009). modern font philosophers understand this assertion by Saint Thomas to mean that all things in nature are contingent on a first cause in order to exist. Saint Thomas argues that this first cause mustiness be God because before the Universe came into existence there had to have been a necessary or non-contingent being to serve as first cause. To help clarify the relationship b... ...things finite and contingent must have a cause next, I argued that no contingent thing can be the cause of itself and finally I added that a drawstring of ca uses cannot be infinite. In conclusion, there must have been a necessary being which served as the first cause of the Universe. This necessary being can be referred to as God. I make this conclusion due to my understanding of the evidence given above and the fact that there are no reasonable arguments that beyond reasonable doubt can prove otherwise. In addition, it is my finding that the roots of the Cosmological Argument are firmly cemented in a posteriori observation (induction), as opposed to purely rational perspective which is deductive. Knowing how this argument is classified is imperative because it is essential to understanding the building of the argument and how it arrives at its conclusion.