.

Monday, April 22, 2019

Film Critique on the Movie Takers Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words

Film Critique on the Movie Takers - Essay ExampleTakers is a film released in August 27, 2010, which details crime life today (Takers, 2010). It is directed by backside Luessenhop and is adopted from a story and screenplay written by Luessenhop, Gabriel Casseus, Peter Allen, John Rogers, and Avery Duff (Dudley, 1984). The film is a narrative that follows up a gang of bank robbers who carry out spectacular robberies. One of their origin work party member forces them into an elaborate heist, however the inside ring members contact is far from being trustworthy. In their grilled occupation, they have one job to accomplish, which seems to be more rewarding than any other. However, this turns out to be a death trap when they ar pulled into this last delegating by their recently paroled cohort T. I, merely unfortunately they are encountered by a hardened detective (matt Dillon) and his counterpart Jay Hernandez (Matt, 2010). The detective wont relief until he gets the thieves and b rings them to justice, and through out the film, his preparation brings a mix of good and bad as the spectator remains with blurred opinion on the two sides. Tanker is a film whose plot is linear, starting at a point where in that respect is one member who is not with them. The member is Ghost (T.I), who was arrested and put behind bars in a previous robbery five years ago. Ghost is released, and he plots for a mission on their behalf. He persuades his gang members to undertake this mission, which is a $20 million dollar project, but they are intercepted by detectives (Scott, 2010). The mission fails, and the gang is defeated with Ghost being the last member to be gunned by detectives Welles and Gordon. As the movie ends, we are left to wonder whether Gordon or Welles survives the injuries they sustained in the gun ensue. There are many conflicts in this movie starting with the first created when Jesse meets with the rest of the crew at a hotel where they discuss the piping of Detective Hatcher. During this meeting, Russian gangsters storm the meeting and try to shoot everyone presents apart from Ghost. This is a conflict between characters where it turns out that ghost had decided to double cross his friends and take down a deal with the gangsters to kill the firm crew for the exchange of $10 million dollars (Scott, 2010). The formerly cold, but well calculated conflict between Ghost and his friends includes the Russian gangster and Ghosts colleagues. This creates a conflict, but it is get backd when Jake kills the Russian. The second conflict is created when Jake and Jesse go home, and find that jakes girlfriend Lilly had been murdered and presently they realize that law surrounded them. This is the last conflict where Ghost is out to double cross them and flail with the stolen money, and they embark on two missions to rescue their money from their lead gangster Ghost and to escape the police attacks (Matt, 2010). This being the last hour and the highest point in the film, the police detectives are well prepared to resolve every other conflict by terminating the gang ring and they succeeded. The main conflict is resolved when every last(predicate) members of the gang are killed and the detectives get hold of the stolen money. The two detectives in the film are symbolic of the forces of justice, which belong to in a society where crime is rife. The fact that they are only two out of the whole police force in the country symbolizes the mighty power of justice and good against big evil. Secondly, there is some ironic twists in the story when Ghost, the leader of the gang turns out

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.